Non-Violent Nationalism and Fundamental Change :: essays research papers fc

nationalism as a concept is defined by the formation of a clean-cut identity for a certain population in terms of their religion, ethnicity or class differences. This term was used to describe the rise of movements along these distinct lines. Since because the connotations of the word may have flipd over time notwithstanding its essential meaning has remained unchanged. The term in essence refers to two varying sentiments. Broadly speaking, the first base of these is a superstar of identification with a certain nation based on ethnic, cultural or religious bounds. The second is a sentiment of consignment to the nation as defined by these ethnic, cultural and religious bound. While the first only serves as a unifying factor in well-nigh cases, the second in any case serves as a rallying call for mass political mobilization. This has been obvious especially in the years immediately after the fleck World war during the time of the disintegration of Colonial power coordina tes and the subsequent creation of a bipolar world. The concept of the non-violent movement was introduced to these anti-colonial movements early enough. Gandhi, the tiny, old military personnel of Indian government came up with the idea of a non-violent independence struggle. This was a struggle which initially rooted itself in a secular context but gradually became cognise as essentially being a Hindu Nationalist movement. Gandhis initial thrust had been towards unifying Indian natives under this superior of non-violence in position to garner support for an ouster of the British from India and an overhaul of the Indian government structure. What this meant was that Gandhi was looking for a primordial change in the structure and hierarchies of the Indian state. This is highlighted in his writings The state after withdrawal (of the Colonizers) will depend largely upon the manner of it. If, as you assume, they (the Colonizers) retire, it seems to me we shall still keep their con stitution and shall rent on the government. Gandhi was and then visibly looking for a structural uprooting of the British / Colonial system and aimed to replace it with one more contributory to the state and, hence, little extractory in nature. This for him was the fundamental change in the system that was required for a successful transformation from a colonized to an independent state.Gandhis method of achieving this change was through the set of nonviolent passive resistance. Passive resistance is a method of securing rights by the personal suffering it is the reverse of resistance by arms.Non-Violent Nationalism and Fundamental Change essays research papers fc Nationalism as a concept is defined by the formation of a distinct identity for a certain population in terms of their religion, ethnicity or class differences. This term was used to describe the rise of movements along these distinct lines. Since then the connotations of the word may have changed over time but its essential meaning has remained unchanged. The term in essence refers to two varying sentiments. Broadly speaking, the first of these is a sense of identification with a certain nation based on ethnic, cultural or religious bounds. The second is a sentiment of loyalty to the nation as defined by these ethnic, cultural and religious bound. While the first only serves as a unifying factor in most cases, the second also serves as a rallying call for mass political mobilization. This has been obvious especially in the years immediately after the Second World War during the time of the disintegration of Colonial power structures and the subsequent creation of a bipolar world. The concept of the non-violent movement was introduced to these anti-colonial movements early enough. Gandhi, the tiny, old man of Indian politics came up with the idea of a non-violent independence struggle. This was a struggle which initially rooted itself in a secular context but gradually became known as essenti ally being a Hindu Nationalist movement. Gandhis initial thrust had been towards unifying Indian natives under this banner of non-violence in order to garner support for an ouster of the British from India and an overhaul of the Indian government structure. What this meant was that Gandhi was looking for a fundamental change in the structure and hierarchies of the Indian state. This is highlighted in his writings The state after withdrawal (of the Colonizers) will depend largely upon the manner of it. If, as you assume, they (the Colonizers) retire, it seems to me we shall still keep their constitution and shall carry on the government. Gandhi was then visibly looking for a structural uprooting of the British / Colonial system and aimed to replace it with one more contributory to the state and, hence, less extractory in nature. This for him was the fundamental change in the system that was required for a successful transformation from a colonized to an independent state.Gandhis meth od of achieving this change was through the practice of nonviolent passive resistance. Passive resistance is a method of securing rights by the personal suffering it is the reverse of resistance by arms.